Ph.D. Octopus

Politics, media, music, capitalism, scholarship, and ephemera since 2010

Affirmative Action and the Post Racial Trap

with 2 comments

by Afrah (the third in a series of three posts on affirmative action)


Affirmative Action got its start in the 1970s as a conservative program that had the support of the Republican administration of Richard Nixon. A combination of the civil rights movement call for change and black student led protest for increased access to majority white college campuses provided the context for the implementation of affirmative action. The purpose of the program was to increase the number of women and historically underrepresented minorities in employment and education. Despite the very auspicious beginnings of a policy that had liberal and conservative support, the backlash began soon thereafter. During the 1970s, the main criticism came from supporters of a so-called colorblind policy.  The current day post racial critique of affirmative action is colorblindness that has been updated and repackaged for the new millennium. Despite its seemingly neutral and laudatory goals, the true purpose of post racialism is to undermine a program that is essential for continued opportunities for people of color.

The 1970s laid the foundation to the eventual conservative political ascendancy that was deeply critical of the racial advancements of the civil rights movement.  The right was able to complete a bit of historic revisionism in embracing the “good” 1960s ideology of colorblindness. They shaped a new racial narrative by employing civil rights rhetoric to critique and attempt to dismantle a program that provided for racial progress. This sort of political positioning was a brilliant and cynical element of the conservative battle against affirmative action. They claimed the unassailable moral high ground while advocating for the policy’s demise.It is perhaps unremarkable that the Republicans soon reversed their position and led the political fight to end the program. The 1978 case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, denied the constitutionality of an explicit racial quota system in admission. The Bakke decision was a measured victory for opponents of affirmative action.  Harvard University’s amicus brief was instrumental in the shaping of the Bakke ruling that left colleges free to consider race as one element in a range of student attributes during the admissions process. The ruling explicitly banned quotas and specific numerical goals for its minority admissions. Another major landmark in the fight against affirmative action was also located in California politics came in the form of Proposition 209, which outlawed affirmative action throughout the University of California system in 1996.

By the late 1990s a visible cohort of African American conservatives became vocal critics of affirmative action. The University of California Regent Ward Connerly and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas gave credence to the idea that the policy led to elevating underachieving  (and therefore undeserving) students of color for admission to elite institutions. These were the “affirmative action babies,” that were not academically qualified, angry, radical. Although the popular narrative inflated and misread the empirical data, students of color who attended college and graduate school during this era had to combat the poor national and campus reputation that unfairly targeted recipients of affirmative action.

This brings us to the present day post racial imaginings of people in all areas of the political spectrum that has targeted affirmative action. This concept reached a fever pitch with the election of Barack Obama in 2008.  It contains a seductive and triumphal reading of our collective racial past. Proponents argue that affirmative action should be relegated to the past due to the racial advancement of the past four decades. There undoubtedly has been dramatic improvement in the educational, employment opportunities, and income for people of color. Yet there are still real disparities between white achievement and black and Latino opportunities. There is an even bigger problem of persistent poverty in communities of color that affirmative action does not address. Affirmative action is an important program that benefits stable working class and middle class. Post racialism flies in the face of a sophisticated and nuanced reading of the social and economic position of people of color.  The post-racial position contains a simple self-denying ordinance: if we do not talk about race, perhaps it will go away. It is a feel good, do nothing belief. We have to fully and completely acknowledge race and continue programs like affirmative action if there is any hope of truly obtaining racial justice.


Written by afrahrichmond

May 28, 2012 at 14:27

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] line with our series of three posts on affirmative action, I thought I would mention this cool new book that just came out called “Too Asian?” […]

    Ph.D. Octopus

    May 29, 2012 at 16:55

  2. , It s all about who you know. For instance, the other day I sent in a job alctipapion. I told my parents, Mom I sent in my alctipapion today. She responded, That s great honey, try and find someone who may know someone at the company. Even though I know you re qualified, you get jobs based on who you know. When she said that it really bothered me. I felt I was qualified for the job and if I wasn t then I did not want to get the job. Why do I need to try and find someone who will convince the hiring manager to hire me? I want to EARN my first job. Soon after this encounter I watched our lecture on affirmative action and nepotism and almost laughed. While everyone is arguing and throwing up their fists that affirmative action is unfair, they aren t even looking in the mirror at the advantages they are given as a result of nepotism. I bet every person who has argued against affirmative action has benefited from nepotism. Yet, when push comes to shove, they aren t yelling that nepotism provides an unfair advantage to people who are sometimes unqualified for a job. People don t argue about things that benefit them that s why no one talks about nepotism. People should earn jobs because they qualified, not because their mother knows the man whose son is the CEO of a company. What does that have to do with being qualified for a job? It s not fair to all of the people who work hard, get internships, and build their resumes to apply for jobs they are qualified for. I thought Sam brought up a great point about affirmative action it doesn t mean people who are unqualified are getting jobs they are unqualified for, it simply means, employers are making sure that they are looking at all candidates equally. Another part of the lecture I thought was interesting was that most of the people who benefit from affirmative action are WHITE WOMEN. Most of my friends who argue against affirmative action are WHITE WOMEN who have most likely benefited either directly or indirectly from affirmative action. Yet, they don t complain about the job they just got through a friend of a friend (nepotism). People get so stuck in their own minds they forget to look at issues from other perspectives. Instead of complaining about affirmative action, they should think about any advantage they have received that was not EARNED. But for some reason people don t like to get outside of their comfort zone and learn about issues. Overall, this class has been a great learning experience and I have enjoyed it thoroughly. It has forced me to get outside of myself and examine issues first hand. It has also taught to me QUESTION question everything I hear, everything I am taught, and everything I am told is true. Most of the things I have been told are not true, which I learned very quickly in this class.


    June 19, 2012 at 21:54

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: